ALBANY, N.Y. (AP) — State regulations make for pretty
dull reading, but you'd never know it from the mountains of cardboard
boxes of public comments generated by the latest gas-drilling guidelines
proposed by New York's environmental agency.
Many of the 204,000
letters anti-drilling groups say they submitted are the result of social
media outreach and meetings at libraries, community centers and
churches where organizers would hand out form letters and stamped
envelopes.
Environmental groups say the volume of comments
demonstrates the intensity of sentiment against natural gas development,
but the industry dismisses it as a misrepresentation of actual
sentiment and a tactic to stall development by drowning regulators in an
ocean of paper.
If nothing else, it demonstrates the grass-roots
organizing power of the anti-gas drilling movement in New York, where
high-volume hydraulic fracturing, or fracking, hasn't even begun.
A
statewide network of hundreds of anti-drilling groups revved up the
effort shortly after the Department of Environmental Conservation posted
updated regulations online at the end of November. When the public
comment period ended Jan. 11, a coalition of groups called New Yorkers
Against Fracking announced it had presented 204,000 comments to the
agency.
Gov. Andrew Cuomo and DEC are expected to decide soon
whether to lift a 4½-year-old moratorium on fracking, which has made
vast quantities of natural gas accessible to drillers who use the
technology to crack gas-rich rock about a mile underground in the
Marcellus Shale, which underlies southern New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio
and West Virginia. Thousands of wells have been drilled and fracked in
the other Marcellus states and across the country.
DEC has a Feb.
27 deadline to finalize new regulations or start new rules from scratch.
Before then, regulators have to read all the public comments and
respond to substantive issues raised.
They have their work cut out
for them. The agency received what it termed an "unprecedented" 66,000
comments on the earlier version of the regulations and the 1,500-page
environmental impact study they were based on, and took most of 2012 to
read, categorize and respond to them.
DEC spokeswoman Emily
DeSantis said the department has 30 to 40 employees at its downtown
Albany offices going through the comments, the majority of which are
form letters. DEC is still counting the comments and as of Thursday had
nearly 120,000.
Drilling companies, industry groups and pro-gas
landowner coalitions have also submitted comments, some of them
criticizing certain requirements as far too restrictive.
"I would
categorize this as another stall tactic stunt," Brad Gill, executive
director of the Independent Oil and Gas Association of New York, said of
the anti-fracking comment effort. "It's nothing more than a reminder of
how passionate and well-organized the opposition groups are to this
industry."
"While anti-fracking groups produce hundreds of
thousands of valueless comments, the gas industry has produced hundreds
of thousands of high-paying jobs," added Karen Moreau, executive
director of the New York State Petroleum Council.
Sandra
Steingraber, a biologist and leader of New Yorkers Against Fracking, set
out to translate regulations into understandable language for people so
they could respond. She spoke at several community meetings held to
generate comments, and she put up a website where she dissected one section
of the regulations each day of the comment period.
"My little
website project alone generated more than 20,000 comments," Steingraber
said. "I don't tell people what to write, I just give the facts and say,
'Knock yourself out.'"
A new group called Students Against
Fracking, a coalition of campus-based anti-fracking groups, organized an
online campaign to get college students home on holiday break to write
comments on the regulations.
Younger students were also recruited to comment.
"A
number of school classrooms took time to go through the regulations and
have students write comments," said John Armstrong of Frack Action.
The
industry-funded group Energy in Depth denounced a fourth-grade
classroom comment-writing exercise in Middletown as "student
indoctrination."
Logan Adsit of South Otselic in Chenango County
went to one of six letter-writing events held in the Southern Tier — the
counties near the Pennsylvania line where shale development is most
likely to begin if it's approved. The meeting was organized by the
Chenango Delaware Otsego Gas Drilling Opposition Group. "They had
stamped envelopes and sample letters that you could just sign and mail,"
Adsit said. "But most people wrote their own."
Jill Weiner, a
member of Catskill Citizens for Safe Energy, said her group generated
23,924 comments. "We did a ton of research and put together 13 letters
our members could take and expand on, or sign and send in as comments,"
she said.
Alex Beauchamp, a professional organizer for New York
City-based Food and Water Watch, said the generation of 204,000 comments
was an impressive achievement.
"Generating petitions for
decision-makers is a tactic used in all kinds of campaigns," Beauchamp
said. "Often, it's like pulling teeth even to get people to sign a
petition. It was good to see people really delve into this."